Design and Evaluation of Self-Healing Networks Using Q-Learning and Digital Twin Technology
Pages
85-104Abstract
The expanding complexity of communication networks nowadays requires reliability, resilience, and quick fault recovery as must-have features for future communication infrastructures. Current fault management solutions are largely manual-based or rule-based static systems, and cannot adequately deal with dynamic and massive network faults. Thus, the purpose of this research is to design and test an intelligent self-healing network framework based on the integration of Reinforcement Learning (RL) and the Digital Twin technology for autonomous, adaptive, and real-time self-healing. The main idea of the proposed system is to design an optimal repair strategy learning agent based on Q-learning that continuously interacts with a simulated network environment and to continuously simulate the physical network with the Digital Twin to predict potential failures according to the historical data and real-time data of the network. The architecture proposed consists of several processing modules, including a network simulator that supports various network topologies including small-world, random, adaptive, scale-free, complete, star and grid networks, a node and edge condition type monitoring and prediction module based on Digital Twins, an ε-greedy Q learning algorithm for making adaptive decisions in the repair process, and a composite health score mechanism based on node and edge conditions. The system also utilizes failure prediction models, historical data management, and reward optimization techniques for enhancing learning convergence and network resilience. The criteria used for the evaluation are: network health, mean time to repair (MTTR), break detection accuracy, false positive rate, network availability, and repair success. Experimental results show that the proposed RL–Digital Twin framework significantly outperforms the traditional repair method of doing nothing, random repair, and a rule-based repair method, with an average network health of 89.4%, an average repair time of 3.1 steps, and a failure prediction accuracy of 91.2%. The RL agent can adapt to various network topologies and converge in 65–100 training episodes. Despite these benefits, the study has been restricted to simulated networks up to 30 nodes, and mainly considers operational failures as opposed to cybersecurity attacks. In addition, scalability challenges remain for larger networks due to the limitations of traditional Q-learning methods.
Keywords:
References
- [1] A. Agrawal, G. Dubey, M. Dubey, P. Narwaria, and D. Khatri, “NEXT GENERATION NETWORKS: ADVANCEMENTS, CHALLENGES, AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR SCALABLE AND SECURE INFRASTRUCTURE,” 2024, pp. 58–71. DOI:10.58532/V3BGNC2P2CH2
- [2] A. Kumar, M. Masud, M. H. Alsharif, N. Gaur, and A. Nanthaamornphong, “Integrating 6G technology in smart hospitals: challenges and opportunities for enhanced healthcare services.,” Front. Med., vol. 12, p. 1534551, 2025. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1534551
- [3] S. Katragadda and G. D, “Self-Healing Networks: Implementing AI-Powered Mechanisms to Automatically Detect and Resolve Network Issues with Minimal Human Intervention,” Dec. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers15040231
- [4] N. Kumar, E. Groenewald, S. Kulkarni, and A. Kariveliparambil, “Self-Healing Networks AI-Based Approaches for Fault Detection and Recovery,” Power Syst. Technol., vol. 47, pp. 371–386, Dec. 2023. DOI:10.52783/pst.206
- [5] G. Shingade, “Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Power System Operation and Control: A Comprehensive Review,” Commun. Appl. Nonlinear Anal., vol. 32, pp. 2007–2022, Mar. 2025. DOI:10.1109/TPWRS.2022.3220799
- [6] Y. Zahraoui et al., “AI Applications to Enhance Resilience in Power Systems and Microgrids—A Review,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 12, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16124959
- [7] A. Inamdar, W. D. van Driel, and G. Zhang, “Digital Twin Technology—A Review and Its Application Model for Prognostics and Health Management of Microelectronics,” Electronics, vol. 13, no. 16, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13163255
- [8] A. Khdoudi, T. Masrour, I. El Hassani, and C. El Mazgualdi, “A Deep-Reinforcement-Learning-Based Digital Twin for Manufacturing Process Optimization,” Systems, vol. 12, no. 2, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12020038
- [9] P. Almasan et al., “Network Digital Twin : Context , Enabling Technologies and Opportunities,” no. Ml, pp. 1–7, 2022. DOI:10.1109/MCOM.001.2200012
- [10] F. B. Mismar and B. L. Evans, “Deep Q-Learning for Self-Organizing Networks Fault Management and Radio Performance Improvement,” 2019. DOI:10.1109/ACSSC.2018.8645083
- [11] D. Saxena, A. K. Singh, and S. Member, “A Self-Healing and Fault-Tolerant Cloud-based,” pp. 1–10, 2025. DOI:10.48550/arXiv.2505.01215
- [12] N. Cheng, S. Member, X. W. Id, S. Member, Z. L. Id, and S. Member, “Toward Enhanced Reinforcement Learning-Based Resource Management via Digital Twin : Opportunities , Applications , and Challenges,” pp. 1–7, 2024. DOI:10.48550/arXiv.2505.01215
- [13] N. Majid and O. Isreal, “AI-Driven Network Automation: A Systematic Review of Self-Organizing and Self- Healing Computer Networks,” Jan. 2026.
- [14] A. Hakiri, A. Gokhale, S. Ben Yahia, and N. Mellouli, “A comprehensive survey on digital twin for future networks and emerging Internet of Things industry,” Comput. Networks, vol. 244, p. 110350, 2024. DOI:10.1016/j.comnet.2024.110350
- [15] T. Ward, N. T. City, K. H. Province, T. Engineering, and I. Technology, “Self-Healing Networks AI-Based Approaches for Fault Detection and Recovery. *1,” vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 4–10, 2023. DOI:10.52783/pst.206
- [16] Z. Noun, M. Saied, H. Muhieddine, H. Shraim, C. Francis, and H. Noura, “Reinforcement learning in fault tolerance and diagnosis fields: A literature review,” Annu. Rev. Control, vol. 61, p. 101055, 2026. DOI:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2026.101055
- [17] R. van Dinter, B. Tekinerdogan, and C. Catal, “Predictive maintenance using digital twins: A systematic literature review,” Inf. Softw. Technol., vol. 151, p. 107008, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2022.107008
- [18] Y. Yang, X. Chen, R. Tan, and Y. Xiao, “IoT Technologies and Applications,” in Intelligent IoT for the Digital World: Incorporating 5G Communications and Fog/Edge Computing Technologies, 2021, pp. 1–60. DOI: 10.1002/9781119593584.ch7
- [19] T. Omar, T. Ketseoglou, O. Naffaa, A. Marzvanyan, and C. Carr, “A Precoding Real-Time Buffer Based Self-Healing Solution for 5G Networks,” J. Comput. Commun., vol. 09, pp. 1–23, Jan. 2021. DOI:10.3390/fi15070244
- [20] S. A. Kauffman, A. Roli, A. Mater, and S. Università, “Beyond the Newtonian Paradigm : A Statistical Mechanics of Emergence,” pp. 1–20, 2021. DOI:10.1098/rsfs.2022.0063
- [21] A. Mujezinović, E. Turajlić, A. Alihodžić, M. M. Dedović, and N. Dautbašić, “Calculation of Magnetic Flux Density Harmonics in the Vicinity of Overhead Lines,” Electronics, vol. 11, no. 4, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11040512
- [22] K. Madala, H. Do, and D. Aceituna, “A Combinatorial Approach for Exposing Off-Nominal Behaviors,” in 2018 IEEE/ACM 40th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), 2018, pp. 910–920. https://doi.org/10.1145/3180155.3180204
Identifiers
Download this PDF file
Statistics
How to Cite
Copyright and Licensing

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.





