Design and Evaluation of Self-Healing Networks Using Q-Learning and Digital Twin Technology

Section: Research Article

Abstract

The expanding complexity of communication networks nowadays requires reliability, resilience, and quick fault recovery as must-have features for future communication infrastructures. Current fault management solutions are largely manual-based or rule-based static systems, and cannot adequately deal with dynamic and massive network faults. Thus, the purpose of this research is to design and test an intelligent self-healing network framework based on the integration of Reinforcement Learning (RL) and the Digital Twin technology for autonomous, adaptive, and real-time self-healing. The main idea of the proposed system is to design an optimal repair strategy learning agent based on Q-learning that continuously interacts with a simulated network environment and to continuously simulate the physical network with the Digital Twin to predict potential failures according to the historical data and real-time data of the network. The architecture proposed consists of several processing modules, including a network simulator that supports various network topologies including small-world, random, adaptive, scale-free, complete, star and grid networks, a node and edge condition type monitoring and prediction module based on Digital Twins, an ε-greedy Q learning algorithm for making adaptive decisions in the repair process, and a composite health score mechanism based on node and edge conditions. The system also utilizes failure prediction models, historical data management, and reward optimization techniques for enhancing learning convergence and network resilience. The criteria used for the evaluation are: network health, mean time to repair (MTTR), break detection accuracy, false positive rate, network availability, and repair success. Experimental results show that the proposed RL–Digital Twin framework significantly outperforms the traditional repair method of doing nothing, random repair, and a rule-based repair method, with an average network health of 89.4%, an average repair time of 3.1 steps, and a failure prediction accuracy of 91.2%. The RL agent can adapt to various network topologies and converge in 65–100 training episodes. Despite these benefits, the study has been restricted to simulated networks up to 30 nodes, and mainly considers operational failures as opposed to cybersecurity attacks. In addition, scalability challenges remain for larger networks due to the limitations of traditional Q-learning methods.

References

  1. [1] A. Agrawal, G. Dubey, M. Dubey, P. Narwaria, and D. Khatri, “NEXT GENERATION NETWORKS: ADVANCEMENTS, CHALLENGES, AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR SCALABLE AND SECURE INFRASTRUCTURE,” 2024, pp. 58–71. DOI:10.58532/V3BGNC2P2CH2
  2. [2] A. Kumar, M. Masud, M. H. Alsharif, N. Gaur, and A. Nanthaamornphong, “Integrating 6G technology in smart hospitals: challenges and opportunities for enhanced healthcare services.,” Front. Med., vol. 12, p. 1534551, 2025. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1534551
  3. [3] S. Katragadda and G. D, “Self-Healing Networks: Implementing AI-Powered Mechanisms to Automatically Detect and Resolve Network Issues with Minimal Human Intervention,” Dec. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers15040231
  4. [4] N. Kumar, E. Groenewald, S. Kulkarni, and A. Kariveliparambil, “Self-Healing Networks AI-Based Approaches for Fault Detection and Recovery,” Power Syst. Technol., vol. 47, pp. 371–386, Dec. 2023. DOI:10.52783/pst.206
  5. [5] G. Shingade, “Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Power System Operation and Control: A Comprehensive Review,” Commun. Appl. Nonlinear Anal., vol. 32, pp. 2007–2022, Mar. 2025. DOI:10.1109/TPWRS.2022.3220799
  6. [6] Y. Zahraoui et al., “AI Applications to Enhance Resilience in Power Systems and Microgrids—A Review,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 12, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16124959
  7. [7] A. Inamdar, W. D. van Driel, and G. Zhang, “Digital Twin Technology—A Review and Its Application Model for Prognostics and Health Management of Microelectronics,” Electronics, vol. 13, no. 16, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13163255
  8. [8] A. Khdoudi, T. Masrour, I. El Hassani, and C. El Mazgualdi, “A Deep-Reinforcement-Learning-Based Digital Twin for Manufacturing Process Optimization,” Systems, vol. 12, no. 2, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12020038
  9. [9] P. Almasan et al., “Network Digital Twin : Context , Enabling Technologies and Opportunities,” no. Ml, pp. 1–7, 2022. DOI:10.1109/MCOM.001.2200012
  10. [10] F. B. Mismar and B. L. Evans, “Deep Q-Learning for Self-Organizing Networks Fault Management and Radio Performance Improvement,” 2019. DOI:10.1109/ACSSC.2018.8645083
  11. [11] D. Saxena, A. K. Singh, and S. Member, “A Self-Healing and Fault-Tolerant Cloud-based,” pp. 1–10, 2025. DOI:10.48550/arXiv.2505.01215
  12. [12] N. Cheng, S. Member, X. W. Id, S. Member, Z. L. Id, and S. Member, “Toward Enhanced Reinforcement Learning-Based Resource Management via Digital Twin : Opportunities , Applications , and Challenges,” pp. 1–7, 2024. DOI:10.48550/arXiv.2505.01215
  13. [13] N. Majid and O. Isreal, “AI-Driven Network Automation: A Systematic Review of Self-Organizing and Self- Healing Computer Networks,” Jan. 2026.
  14. [14] A. Hakiri, A. Gokhale, S. Ben Yahia, and N. Mellouli, “A comprehensive survey on digital twin for future networks and emerging Internet of Things industry,” Comput. Networks, vol. 244, p. 110350, 2024. DOI:10.1016/j.comnet.2024.110350
  15. [15] T. Ward, N. T. City, K. H. Province, T. Engineering, and I. Technology, “Self-Healing Networks AI-Based Approaches for Fault Detection and Recovery. *1,” vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 4–10, 2023. DOI:10.52783/pst.206
  16. [16] Z. Noun, M. Saied, H. Muhieddine, H. Shraim, C. Francis, and H. Noura, “Reinforcement learning in fault tolerance and diagnosis fields: A literature review,” Annu. Rev. Control, vol. 61, p. 101055, 2026. DOI:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2026.101055
  17. [17] R. van Dinter, B. Tekinerdogan, and C. Catal, “Predictive maintenance using digital twins: A systematic literature review,” Inf. Softw. Technol., vol. 151, p. 107008, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2022.107008
  18. [18] Y. Yang, X. Chen, R. Tan, and Y. Xiao, “IoT Technologies and Applications,” in Intelligent IoT for the Digital World: Incorporating 5G Communications and Fog/Edge Computing Technologies, 2021, pp. 1–60. DOI: 10.1002/9781119593584.ch7
  19. [19] T. Omar, T. Ketseoglou, O. Naffaa, A. Marzvanyan, and C. Carr, “A Precoding Real-Time Buffer Based Self-Healing Solution for 5G Networks,” J. Comput. Commun., vol. 09, pp. 1–23, Jan. 2021. DOI:10.3390/fi15070244
  20. [20] S. A. Kauffman, A. Roli, A. Mater, and S. Università, “Beyond the Newtonian Paradigm : A Statistical Mechanics of Emergence,” pp. 1–20, 2021. DOI:10.1098/rsfs.2022.0063
  21. [21] A. Mujezinović, E. Turajlić, A. Alihodžić, M. M. Dedović, and N. Dautbašić, “Calculation of Magnetic Flux Density Harmonics in the Vicinity of Overhead Lines,” Electronics, vol. 11, no. 4, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11040512
  22. [22] K. Madala, H. Do, and D. Aceituna, “A Combinatorial Approach for Exposing Off-Nominal Behaviors,” in 2018 IEEE/ACM 40th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), 2018, pp. 910–920. https://doi.org/10.1145/3180155.3180204
Download this PDF file

Statistics

How to Cite

[1]
“The Design and Evaluation of Self-Healing Networks Using Q-Learning and Digital Twin Technology”, JES, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 85–104, Oct. 2026, doi: 10.33899/jes.v35i4.62252.
Copyright and Licensing

How to Cite

[1]
“The Design and Evaluation of Self-Healing Networks Using Q-Learning and Digital Twin Technology”, JES, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 85–104, Oct. 2026, doi: 10.33899/jes.v35i4.62252.