Bibliometric Study of Research Productivity at the University of Mosul
Pages
89-99Keywords:
Abstract
Research output is one of the most important aspects of the productivity of universities and scientific institutions. In practice, measuring this productivity no longer depends on quantity only, but type and quality have become a key factor. In this work, the research’s productivity and impact of the University of Mosul (UoM) was analyzed by implementing a complete bibliometric study. The OpenAlex database was used to create a dataset containing information on UoM research for the period 2018–2025. The results identified the most active researchers and the disciplines with the highest publication and international collaboration rates. The main contribution of this work is to provide a clear picture to decision-makers at the UoM about the activity of researchers, including names and specializations. Additionally, this study also aims to measure the accuracy and reliability of the use of OpenAlex data as an open-source bibliographic source
References
- K. Garg, M. Lamba, and R. Singh, “Bibliometric Analysis of Papers Published During 1992–2019 in DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology,” DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, vol. 40, pp. 396–402, 2020, doi: 10.14429/djlit.40.6.15741.
- M. Yıldız and T. Karakus Yılmaz, “Bibliometric Analysis in Scientific Research Using R: A Review of Scopus and Web of Science Databases,” Journal of Data Applications, pp. 31–46, 2024, doi: 10.26650/JODA.1462396.
- M. Juliardi and I. Malik, “Bibliometric Analysis of Data Science: Trends, Contributions, and Research Developments,” West Science Interdisciplinary Studies, vol. 1, pp. 365–375, 2023, doi: 10.58812/wsis.v1i07.81.
- I. Passas, “Bibliometric Analysis: The Main Steps,” Encyclopedia, vol. 4, pp. 1014–1025, 2024, doi: 10.3390/encyclopedia4020065.
- F. Maulana, L. Maghfiroh, S. Sari, and F. Rantam, “A Bibliometric Analysis of Worldwide Research on One Health from 2012 to 2022,” International Journal of One Health, pp. 159–165, 2023, doi: 10.14202/IJOH.2023.159-165.
- A. Nuar and C. Seah, “Examining the Trend of Research on Big Data Architecture: Bibliometric Analysis Using Scopus Database,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 234, pp. 172–179, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2024.04.010.
- R. Awad and H. Flayyih, “Artificial Intelligence and Trends in Use of Information Technology Governance: A Bibliometric Analysis,” 2025, doi: 10.34093/1b4z7m91.
- J. M. Saiz-Alvarez, “Innovation Management: A Bibliometric Analysis of 50 Years of Research Using VOSviewer and Scopus,” World, vol. 5, pp. 901–928, 2024, doi: 10.3390/world5040046.
- B. Shnawa and S. Al-Majmaie, “Oncology Research Productivity of Iraqi Authors: A Bibliometric Analysis During 1955–2019,” Medico-Legal Update, vol. 21, pp. 174–182, 2021.
- B. Mezquita, L. Martín-Delgado, L. Wennberg Capellades, and Á. Borrego, “A Comparison of OpenAlex with Scopus and Web of Science for Tracking Scholarly Nursing Literature,” SAGE Open Nursing, vol. 11, 2025, doi: 10.1177/23779608251361012.
- M. Zheng, L. Miao, Y. Bu, and V. Larivière, “Understanding Discrepancies in the Coverage of OpenAlex: The Case of China,” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2025, doi: 10.1002/asi.70013.
- A. Maddi, M. Maisonobe, and C. Boukacem-Zeghmouri, “Geographical and Disciplinary Coverage of Open Access Journals: OpenAlex, Scopus, and WoS,” PLOS ONE, vol. 20, 2025, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320347.
- S. Rochman, N. Rustaman, T. Ramalis, K. Amri, A. Zukmadini, H. Apriza, A. Putra, and I. Ismail, “How Bibliometric Analysis Using VOSviewer Based on,” ASEAN Journal of Science and Engineering, vol. 4, pp. 251–294, 2024, doi: 10.17509/ajse.v4i2.71567.
- J. P. Alperin, J. Portenoy, K. Demes, V. Larivière, and S. Haustein, “An Analysis of the Suitability of OpenAlex for Bibliometric Analyses,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.17663, 2024, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2404.17663.
- J. Culbert, A. Hobert, N. Jahn, N. Haupka, M. Schmidt, P. Donner, and P. Mayr, “Reference Coverage Analysis of OpenAlex Compared to Web of Science and Scopus,” Scientometrics, vol. 130, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s11192-025-05293-3.
- K. Garg, S. Kumar, and R. Singh, “Journal of Documentation: A Bibliometric Study of Papers Published from 2000 to 2023,” Journal of Data Science, Informetrics, and Citation Studies, vol. 3, pp. 258–268, 2024, doi: 10.5530/jcitation.3.3.27.
- K. Garg and S. Kumar, “Bibliometric Analysis of Papers Published in Indian Journal of Chemistry—Section A and Section B During 2015–2020,” Journal of Data Science, Informetrics, and Citation Studies, vol. 1, pp. 3–11, 2022, doi: 10.5530/jcitation.1.1.2.
- L. Céspedes et al., “Evaluating the Linguistic Coverage of OpenAlex: An Assessment of Metadata Accuracy and Completeness,” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, vol. 76, 2025, doi: 10.1002/asi.24979.
- C. Stansfield, H. Dehdarirad, J. Thomas, S. Mathew, and A. O’Mara-Eves, “Analyzing the Utility of OpenAlex to Identify Studies for Systematic Reviews: Methods and a Case Study,” Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods, vol. 3, 2025, doi: 10.1002/cesm.70038.
- R. Julius, M. S. Abd Halim, N. A. Hadi, A. Alias, M. Khalid, Z. Mahfodz, and F. Farha, “Bibliometric Analysis of Research in Mathematics Education using Scopus Database,” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 17, p. em2040, 2021, doi: 10.29333/ejmste/11329.
Identifiers
Download this PDF file
Statistics
How to Cite
Copyright and Licensing

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.





