تحکیم المرکز الدولی لتسویة منازعات الاستثمار لشرط الدولة الآولى بالرعایة

القسم: RESEARCH
إصدار
مجلد 24 عدد 77 (2021): المجلد 24 العدد 77
منشور
Dec 1, 2021
##editor.issues.pages##
72-129

الملخص

لقد أصبح شرط الدولة الأولى بالرعایة من مرتکزات اتفاقیات الاستثمار الثنائیة، ولهذا فقد تناول هذا البحث الإشکالیات التی تعترض تطبیق هذا الشرط أمام المرکز الدولی لتسویة منازعات الاستثمار وملاءمة استدعاء هذا الشرط فی سیاق ممارسة اختصاصه التحکیمی لتسویة منازعات الاستثمار. وقد رکز الجزء الأول من البحث دراسته على نطاق اختصاص المرکز الموضوعی والشخصی فضلاً عن دور إرادة الأطراف ومدى اعتبارها فی سیاق ممارسات المرکز. أما الجزء الثانی فقد تناول بالدراسة والتحلیل احتجاج الطرف المستفید بالشرط أمام المرکز و منهجیة الأخیر فی التعامل معه وما یرتبط بها من إشکالیات قانونیة تتعلق بطبیعة الشرط وطبیعة الاحتجاج به فضلاً عن نطاقه ومداه وذلک من خلال ورشة تحلیلیة جمعت القانون ونصوصه، الفقه واراءه والقضاء وأحکامه. حیث کان لسوابق المرکز التحکیمیة حضوراً محوریاً بغیة تتبع مناهجه التحکیمیة واتجاهاته التفسیریة لهذا الشرط.

المراجع

  1. Ali Sadiq Abu Al-Haif, Public International Law, 17th Edition, Alexandria Knowledge Foundation, 1997.
  2. Basoud Abdel Malek, Protection of Foreign Investments in the Light of Institutional Arbitration, a letter submitted to obtain a doctorate in public law to Abu Bakr Belkaid University of Tlemcen, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, 2015.
  3. Report of the Executive Directors on the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes Between the States and Nationals of other States, March 18, 1965.
  4. Treaty of Amity and Commerce between the United States and France of 1778.
  5. The significance of Hisham's rumor, Appealing to the International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes and its Effects on the Parties, Journal of Ijtihad for Legal and Economic Studies, Volume 7, Issue 1, 2018:
  6. Suzy H. Nikima, The Most-FavouredNation Clause in Investment Treaties, IISD Best Practices Series - February 2017.
  7. Viviana Herrera Ramrez, Efectos sorpresivos de la clusula de la nacin ms favorecida (CNMF) en materia de inversiones extranjeras (Estudio de la jurisprudencia del Centro Internacional de Arreglo de Diferencias relativas a las inversiones CIADI), Revista Civilizar, Colombia, Universidad Sergio Arboleda, Vol. 9, No. 16, enero-junio de 2009.12
  8. Tony Cole , The Boundaries of Most Favored Nation Treatment in International Investment Law, Michigan Journal of International Law Vol.33 ,Issue 3 ,2012.
  9. PR Thulasidhass, Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment in International Investment Law: Ascertaining the Limits through Interpretative Principles, Amsterdam Law Forum , Vol.7.1, 2015.
  10. Zachary Douglas, The MFN Clause in Investment Arbitration: Treaty Interpretation Off the Rails, Journal of International Dispute Settlement, Vol. 2, Issue 1, February 2011.
  11. Benedict Kingsbury and Stephen Schil, Investor-State Arbitration as Governance: Fair and Equitable Treatment, Proportionality and the Emerging Global Administrative Law, NYU School of Law Public Law Research Paper ,2009.
  12. Evode Kayitana, The scope and applicability of Most-Favoured-Nation (MFN) clause in investment treaties: a survey of the jurisprudence of the international centre for settlement of investment disputes,Nnamdi Azikiwe University Journal of International Law and Jurisprudence, Vol.9, No.1, 2018.
  13. Irene Gabriela Garca Corona , Arbitraje de inversin: la clusula de la nacin ms favorecida en derechos adjetivos,Instituto de Investigaciones Jurdicas, Universidad Nacional Autnoma de Mxico, Mxico ,2013.
  14. Alejandro Faya Rodriguez, The Most-Favored-Nation Clause in International Investment Agreements: A Tool for Treaty Shopping?, Journal of Arbitration International 2008.
  15. General Assembly Resolution 46/416 of December 19, 1991
  16. Muhammad Youssef Alwan, Public International Law (Introduction and Sources), 3rd Edition, Wael House for Publishing and Distribution, Amman, 2003.
  17. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties of 1969.
  18. Pierre Lalive, The First World Bank Arbitration (Holiday Innsv.Morocco)Some Legal Problems, British Yearbook of International Law, Volume 51, Issue 1, 1980.
  19. Nihad Khalil Demashkieh, Tammam Sobeih, Comprehensive Guide to World Trade Organization Agreements, Damascus, 2010.
  20. Washington Agreement for the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Citizens of Other Countries for the year 1965.
  21. International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes , ICSID Additional Facility Rules, ICSID/11, April 2006,
  22. Agreement on Encouragement and Mutual Protection of Investments between the Kingdom of Spain and the Republic of Argentina for the year 1991.
  23. Aron Broches, Selected Essays. World Bank, ICSID, and Other Subjects of Public and Private International Law, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, London, 1995.
  24. Franz Kundmller Caminiti and Roger Rubio Guerrero, El arbitraje del CIADI y el Derecho internacionalde lasinversiones: un nuevo horizonte, Lima Arbitration, N. 1, 2006.
  25. Treaty between the Federal Republic of Germany and the Republic of Argentina on the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investments of 1991.
  26. Ibrahim F. I. Shihata , Towards a greater depoliticization of investment disputes : the roles of ICSID and MIGA , In Kevin W. Lu, Gero Verheyen ( with others eds), Investing with Confidence, Understanding Political Risk Management in the 21st Century , International Bank for Reconstruction and Development , Washington, 1992.
  27. Paul C. Szasz, A Practical Guide to the Convention on Settlement of Investment Disputes, Cornell International Law Journal, Vol. 1, Issue 1, Spring 1968.
  28. ICSID ,TheHistory of the ICSID Convention,Vol. II, Part 2 , DOCUMENTS 44.146, Washington,2006.
  29. Stephen T. Lynch , The International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes: Selected Case Studies , Maryland Journal of International Law , Vol. 7 , Issue 2,.
  30. Agreement on Encouragement and Mutual Protection of Investments between the Kingdom of Denmark and the Republic of Argentina for the year 1992.
  31. Georg Schwarzenberger, The Most-Favoured-Nation Standard in British State Practice, Britain Yales Book International Law,Vol. 22.
  32. Moshe Hirsch, The Arbitration Mechanism of the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, London, 1993.
  33. North American Free Trade Agreement between the United States, Canada and Mexico of 1992.
  34. Stephan Schill, Multilateralizing Investment Treaties through Most-Favoured-Nation Clauses, BerkeleyJournalof InternationalLaw, Vol.27, 2009.
  35. United Nations Conference on Trade and development, Most-Favoured Nation Treatment, UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II, United Nations, Switzerland, 2010.
  36. United Nations , Report of the International Law Commission , Sixtieth session (5 May-6 June and 7 July-8 August 2008) General Assembly Official Records, Sixty-third session Supplement No. 10 (A/63/10),
  37. Yearbook of the International Law Commission 1978, Vol. II, Part 2,
  38. Fifth: International decisions and reports
  39. First: Books and references
  40. Fourth: International Treaties and Agreements
  41. References
  42. Second: Research and articles
  43. Third: Messages and Frameworks

##default.groups.name.author##

فتحي علي فتحي

كلية الحقوق/ جامعة الموصل

ORCID

المعرفات

https://doi.org/10.33899/alaw.2020.127924.1098
تنزيل هذا الملف
PDF (English)

الإحصائيات